"The
first casualty of war is truth" - an old saying.
Yes.
Be it the Cold War, or the War Against Drugs, or western
imperialism's wars of aggression against Yugoslavia, Afghanistan,
Iraq, Libya (I mention only the latest ones), or the War Against
Terrorism, or regime-change wars masquerading as "color
revolutions" and "jihads", or the War Against CO2,
or the War Against COVID-19 - the first casualty always was and is
the truth.
The
mass-media frenzy around COVID-19 continues now already for six
months and shows no sign of calming down. Everyone on our planet is
constantly bombarded with terrifying news and grave warnings/orders,
such as:
-
the overwhelming numbers of the victims of COVID-19: dead, ill,
presumably infected and tested positively;
-
the necessity to isolate him/herself from relatives, friends,
neighbors, colleagues and acquaintances - so-called
"social distancing" or rather antisocial
distancing;
- the prohibition to appear in
shops, public transport and other public places without a mask
covering mouth and nose;
-
the prophesies of the "inevitable second wave of COVID-19
pandemics";
-
urgent misleading
warnings not to use as medicine or prophylactics the combination of
Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, zinc, and vitamins, especially
vitamins D and C, because it allegedly
is not only ineffective against COVID-19 but also can inflict harm
and even be the cause of death;
-
comforting announcements that COVID-19 perhaps can be cured with
experimental very expensive antiviral agent Remdesivir;
-
enthusiastic promises of speedy arrival of the ultimate wonder remedy
which will defeat COVID-19 once and for all - scarcely tested but
nevertheless "safe and effective" vaccine;
-
peremptory statements that there is no alternative to vaccines as
instrument of boosting immune defenses of human organism against
viruses in general and COVID-19 in particular...
In
a word, the virus SARS-CoV-2 which is the hero of COVID-19 mass-media
campaign is depicted as a terrifying menace to the mankind and
vaccines are depicted as the only defence against it. We see
intimidating pictures of SARS-CoV-2 such as this one
every time we watch news, and
this virus acquired some resemblance to such unqestionably dangerous
things as sea mines:
which when touched, explode and
cause enormous devastation:
As
a result, this virus caused mass panic and a desire to hide from it
at home and remain forever under house arrest:
Considering
the unprecedented fact that a virus
which every winter plays a minor role beside influenza viruses,
rhinoviruses and other coronaviruses in seasonal respiratory diseases
from common cold to pneumonia, suddenly
became the main theme of mass-media and an important agent in the
spheres of politics and economics, it is high time for everyone to
find out, which information is true and which is a fake. I invite you
to do it together with me.
Certainly, we shall discuss only
those themes which belong to the spheres of medical virology and
molecular biology and leave without consideration political and
economic aspects of COVID-19. We shall start with the easiest
questions and most obvious answers and then proceed to those which
require scientific knowledge to come to sane and valid answers.
First
a short introduction of our hero - the virus SARS-CoV-2. It belongs
to the group of coronaviruses, is ball-shaped having the diameter of
approx. 125 nm (0,125 μm) and consist of
single-stranded positive-sense RNA molecule ca. 30 kilobase long
packaged as a nucleocapsid and a lipid bilayer membrane envelope with
embedded functional proteins,. It looks this way under the electron
microscope:
Sometimes
it is painted as a sort of pretty flower bed:
Now
we can start answering easy questions. First of all, we can see that
the first picture showing viruses SARS-CoV-2 of the same size as
erythrocytes is wrong. Erythrocytes have the diameter of approx. 8
μm, they are at least 60 times bigger than
coronaviruses. But more important is the fact that 40 to 90 % of
particles as big as 1000 nm (1 μm) DO
penetrate masks made of cloth and surgical masks made of nonwoven
fabric:
These
masks are designed to be used in sterile
operation rooms as the means of
protecting the patient from any bacteria
which could eventually be exhaled by the surgeon and his assistants.
Therefore these masks do NOT protect from SARS-CoV-2 viruses. This
fact is sometimes stated on the package:
Nevertheless there are many
brainwashed mask believers who don't want to see this plain truth:
.
.
The
same should be said about all sorts of cloth and non-woven fabric
masks. (See here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloth_face_mask
) All these masks get soaked with exhaled moisture already after
several minutes of usage and loose the ability to filtrate air which
then begins to pass through the gaps between the mask and user's
face.
More
interesting is the case of N95 graded
respirators:
They
have better filtrating properties and DO protect from fine dust
particles and bacteria (but alas, NOT viruses) in the air. They have
a valve which releases the exhaled air without filtering because tiny
pore size make breathing too difficult and even impossible after the
filter is clogged with exhaled moisture. But please note that for a
person infected with COVID-19 wearing a N95 respirator does not
hinder him/her to act as the source of infection for others!
Whether
we like it or not, we cannot evade contact with SARS-CoV-2
or any other viruses without using special
protective gear like this:
It
means that wearing masks in everyday life is nothing but an
antiscientific superstition and has the only function to submit
people to the officially prescribed ritual. This fact reflects the
fundamental principle that mankind and all
other living beings always lived, live now and will live in future in
constant unavoidable symbiosis with viruses.
It is now evident that genetical interactions between viruses and
living beings is the major source of genetic diversity and thus the
basis of the evolution of all species. Now, after the human genome
was sequenced, we know that about half,
possibly even two-thirds of its sequence are nothing but more or less
complete endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and related retroelements
(REs). They are remnants of ancient retroviral germline infections
that became evolutionarily fixed in the genome. (See
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433886/
).
These
numerous viral sequences found in our DNA are not a genetically
neutral archaism. The majority of viral sequences are integrated in
our non-coding genes. Coding genes are like musicians who, instead of
producing sound, produce proteins, which are the fundamental
building-blocks of all life forms. Non-coding genes play an even more
fundamental role; they are like a conductor directing the musicians -
they modulate the expression of coding genes. (See
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468922/
).
Therefore
it is extremely important NOT to interfere with this interplay of
human genome and the multitude of viruses existing in the biosphere.
Genetic manipulation in general and particularly that of viruses can
have devastating consequences for health and even existence of man as
biological species. Unfortunately, there are indications that
SARS-CoV-2 virus is a product of irresponsible clandestine genetic
manipulation.
But
before we turn our attention to the peculiarities of SARS-CoV-2
virus, it should be noted that the majority of deaths officially
ascribed to COVID-19 in reality are caused by
other causes, among them lack of or incompetent medical treatment of
the victims. Majority of COVID-19 death
cases are in fact cases of tuberculosis overlaid with SARS-CoV-2
infection, especially among the decrepit poor of New York and
Northern Italy. More than 80% of COVID-19-related deaths are caused
by TB and other co-morbid conditions. (See
https://www.globalresearch.ca/forced-vaccination-plan-unveiled/5718238
).
This
thesis is substantiated by the fact that the BCG TB-vaccine reduces
the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 3-fold and drugs used to treat TB
(azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine) are successfully used to treat
COVID-19. (See
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-preliminary-tuberculosis-vaccine-limiting-covid-.html
).
But
the major causes of excessive death cases are political measures of
"war against COVID-19". They are twofold: first, the
re-profiling of clinics and other medical institutions from their
usual activities towards "fighting against Corona-pandemics"
This re-profiling severely restricted access of patients to necessary
treatment, especially of non-infectious diseases such as cancer and
cardiovascular conditions, and substantially increased the waiting
list of cases requiring urgent treatment or surgery:
Second, it is the compulsory
"isolation" (i.e. lockdown or house arrest) with all
inevitable negative social, psychological and medical consequences,
such as for example deficit of physical exercise, fresh air and
vitamin D which requires insolation of skin to be synthesized by
human body:
The
most obvious confirmation of this thesis is provided by the politics
of the British government which imposed isolation later than many
other countries, actually after the winter peak of mortality caused
by acute respiratory diseases. British web site UK Column News traced
this development each week and here is the result:
This
diagram shows the excessive seasonal mortality as compared with the
average of previous years. The peak occurred definitely after the
lockdown was imposed on the 13th week of 2020.
And here you can see the
comparison of the number of diagnosed cases and deaths between
lockdown- and non-lockdown-countries:
It
is now the right moment to recapitulate that coronaviruses are
actually nothing more than one member of the triad of pathogens
(together with influenza- and rhino-viruses) causing every winter
seasonal peaks of viral respiratory diseases. Even with the excessive
deaths caused by political measures the total number of deaths in
2019-2020 from seasonal respiratory diseases does not exceed the
average of the last 50 years.
In
short, government policies almost everywhere in the world (with the
rare exceptions like Belarus or Sweden) were counterproductive. But
are there any medicines which really cure COVID-19 caused by
SARS-CoV-2?
There are announcements in the
mass-media that MAYBE the antiviral agent called Remdesivir will
help. It should be noted that Remdesivir was developed as a medicine
against Ebola virus which belongs to a different type of viruses
(Filoviridae) which not only look very differently:
but
also have a totally different mechanism of infection (with
single-strand negative-sense
RNA), from coronaviruses which have single-strand positive-sense
RNA. Nevertheless Remdesivir is advertised by its manufacturer (price
for a 5-day treatment is no less than 2340 US $) as a "promising
experimental treatment" (see
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/493732-big-pharma-pandemic-covid/
),
whereas
the efficient (see e.g.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/media-sabotage-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19-doctors-worldwide-protest-disaster/5717382
) treatment of the initial phase of COVID-19 with the combination of
Chloroquin, Azithromycin, Zinc and vitamins D and C is maliciously
slandered by mass-media as "ineffective and life-threatening".
Maybe it is because this really effective treatment is dirt-cheap
(the price of Hydroxychloroquin and Azithromycin sufficient for a 10-day
treatment is 30 Euro in Germany!)
The
effectiveness of this treatment against corona viruses is nothing
new. It was successfully used already in 2012 to treat cases of
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Its
mechanism of action against corona viruses is presumed to be as
follows: Hydroxychloroquine
affects glycosilation of the ACE-2 pulmonary cell receptors,
impairing viral cell entry (see
https://dx.doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.5582/bst.2020.01047
) whereas Azithromycin
opens channels in pulmonary cell membranes to allow entry of Zn+2
ions which disrupt functioning of the
coronaviral replicase-transcriptase complex
which carries out both replication and transcription of viral RNA in
infected cells (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus
):
Certainly
it is undeniable that treatment of COVID-19 at its late
life-threatening stage of so-called "broken glass in lungs":
(which
actually is massive inflammation and thrombosis of lungs) with the
combination of Hydroxychloroquin, Azithromycin, Zinc and vitamins D and C
would be too late, but at least this treatment does not kill patients
the way officially prescribed "ventilators" do, which
mechanically tear lungs already badly damaged by inflammation (see
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/ventilator-induced-lung-injury
)
Nevertheless
mass-media repeat ad nauseam that the only means to defeat COVID-19
are vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines tirelessly publicized and
advertised by Mr. Bill Gates. The question "Who is Mr. Gates?"
is properly answered in following recent videos authored by Mr. James
Corbett and can be watched here:
Mr. Bill Gates has enormous (and
very negative) influence on the governments around the world and on
such organizations as WHO. Therefore it is very important to give
substantiated rebuttal to his wild and ignorant claims and promises,
as well as to show really promising alternatives which unfortunately
are being suppressed. But first we need to turn to relevant
scientific facts of molecular virology and immunology.
The
fundamental fact is that viruses exist only thanks their symbiosis
with some really living organism, be it a bacteria or a man. Killing
their host threatens their own existence. Therefore the great majority
of viruses is NOT pathogenic; they are just harmless molecular
parasites. And even pathogenic viruses are NOT instant killers, and
they kill only vulnerable (sick, old, decrepit) organisms.
Second,
viral infections have the following peculiarity: viruses always play
the game of molecular deception. They always pretend to be not a
foreign intruder but something belonging to the host organism. In our
case the SARS-CoV-2 virus pretends to be the organism's molecular
message angiotensin when binding to the host cell receptor -
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE-2) and inserting viral RNA into
its cytoplasm. It means that viruses always sneak like a cat and
never threateningly trample like a maori warrior:
It
practically means that the co-evolution of viruses with the host
species enabled them to evade the host's immune system. Keeping that
in mind let us now evaluate the benefits and dangers of vaccines. It
is clear that vaccines DO protect organism against openly hostile
invaders, for example pathogenic bacteria, when the active ingredient
(antigen) of a given vaccine is some peculiar molecular component of
the pathogenic microorganism: fragment of cell wall, capsule or an
exotoxin. Exactly this makes the vaccines against e.g. cholera,
plague, tetanus or anthrax efficient.
On the other hand the business
(it IS nothing but business!) of vaccines is very tricky. But first
be it reminded that vaccines work inducing specific antibodies
against antigens they contain:
Human
organism generates many different
antibodies against the injected antigens after vaccine injection(s). Antibodies among other
things differ in their mode of action:
Although
all of them may agglutinate antigens in laboratory, in a living
organism some of them turn out to be neutralizing, and the others -
binding (non-neutralizing or opsonising). Roughly speaking, the first
type of antibodies works as part of the humoral immune system and the
second - as part of cell-mediated immune system. It means that
binding antibodies bind to an antigen, marking it for subsequent
destruction by phagocytes. Neutralizing antibodies, on the other
hand, stop the function of the antigen (in our case, prevent binding
of SARS-CoV-2 viruses to the epithelial cells of lungs).
Ideally
vaccination should produce neutralizing antibodies to disable
invading virus before it has a chance to cause infection. But reality
is very different, mainly because viruses are nano-cats and not
micro-maori-warriors. All their components are evolutionary selected
to immunologically resemble as much as possible the biomolecules
which the host organism recognizes as belonging to itself and not as
something foreign. This is exactly the case of SARS-CoV-2 viral
protein S which mimics host's tissue hormone angiotensin.
That
is why anti-viral vaccines often contain not only viral antigens, but
also adjuvants - biologically and chemically aggressive substances
which cause inflammation and thus provoke immune reaction of
vaccinated organism against the components of vaccines. It must be
noted that in addition to adjuvants vaccines contain sterilized
viruses in their cultivation broth containing remnants of "immortal",
i.e. cancerous cell culture - a nondescript wild mixture of
substances which inevitably acts as a potpourri of antigens...
No
wonder that "anti-viral" vaccines are notoriously
dangerous. There are plenty of cases when hundreds and even thousands
of vaccinated people became victims of severe diseases among which
often are exactly the diseases the vaccine is claimed to protect
against! This is particularly the case of vaccines against
coronaviruses. In order not to be branded as "an ignorant
anti-vaxxer" I would prefer to quote a number of passages from
this source:
https://gumshoenews.com/2020/04/23/did-new-2019-flu-shots-cause-viral-interference-to-create-the-perfect-covid-storm/
:
"Animal
Corona vaccine trials (in 2012-2014):
After vaccinating the animals, the outcomes seemed positive, as
antibodies were present, and animals seemingly healthy. However, on
reinfection, i.e. when "challenged" with SARS-Cov-1, those
animals in every one of the studies then reacted poorly. They
exhibited "vaccine-induced enhancement" (of immune
response). The process of vaccination and interfering with the
animals' immune system made them more vulnerable to that coronavirus
strain. (...)
The
new 2019 flu vaccine: I'll first quote
the UK publichealthmatters blog (2019/10/04), a post entitled: "Flu
vaccination: The main things to know about the 2019" and the
"Time to get your flu jab" programme:
'...
A wider range of flu vaccines are now available which should offer
better protection. This includes the "adjuvanted" vaccine
which was offered to those aged 65 years and over for the first time
last year and provided a higher level of protection compared to the
standard non-adjuvanted vaccines in this age group. In 2019 the flu
vaccines got an upgrade. There was the addition of a new cell-based
vaccine which protects against four strains of flu (quadruvalent) -
including a H1N1-pdm09-like virus and a H3N2-like virus; plus there's
a High Dose Vaccination designed specifically for seniors'
(...)
COVID-19
deaths: Who is dying from COVID-19? -
Mainly older people in their 70s and 80s with an already existing
health complications (as the sample of 355 Italians suggests).
However, some healthy younger people are dying, and so are healthy
medical staff. So who across the world got the flu shot in 2019?
The
2019 flu season and flu shot: Well, the
elderly and those with health complications were urged to get the flu
shot. And medical staff, those working in hospitals for example, were
encouraged or directed to have the flu shots. Some of the more
cautious people in their 20s, 30s and 40s decided to get the flu shot
too, as well as did many young children aged between 2 and 5. And
there were special super-shots for the elderly too. However, as I
will explain later, I am going to discount the young. Plus their
immature immune systems are adapting, evolving and "learning"
to survive in the world.
Looking at the COVID-19 hot spots,
many correlate with 2019 influenza hot spots - and where there was a
strong uptake in vaccines. Italy was badly hit by COVID-19 with over
23000 deaths. Since the start of the flu season in October 2019,
there were 2768000 cases of flu recorded across Italy - that is 2,7
million in a population of 60 million. At the flu outbreak peak in
mid-January 488000 cases were recorded in one week, and about one
million people were vaccinated.
CBS
News New York on 26 December 2019 warned about the flu season, the
longest in a decade: 'Health Department:
Confirmed flu cases in NYC up 77%: The flu season is also in high
gear here in the Big Apple... everyone who is able is being advised
to get a flu shot. Flu kills an average of 8000 people every year,
and it can be particularly serious in older adults, very young
children, and people with underlying health conditions... Employers
of frontline health and social care workers also have a
responsibility to ensure their staff can get free vaccine.'
Vaccine-induced
enhancement: But will the flu shot
lower risk for coronavirus?
About
four years ago, Dr. Peter Hotez was trialling a SARS vaccine with
animals. NBC News in the US reported (5 March 2020): "Scientists
were close to a coronavirus vaccine years ago. Then the money dried
up." Dr. Hotez suggests that the
vaccine that he had been working on for SARS in 2016 could have
provided cross-protection against COVID-19...
But
wait. Later, in the same NBC article, there is the reference to the
animal trials: "Early efforts to
develop a SARS vaccine in animal trials were plagued by a phenomenon
known as 'vaccine-induced enhancement', in which recipients exhibit
worse symptoms after being injected - something Dr. Fauci said
researchers must be mindful of as they work to quickly develop a
vaccine against COVID-19."
Essentially the vaccine was
making the animals MORE vulnerable to the virus, dramatically
compromising their immune system - resulting in the equivalent of a
cytokine storm. Sound familiar?
It
appears that all the countries and cities that were badly affected
had some flu outbreak in late 2019 and early 2020, and that their
governments had campaigns encouraging the elderly and medical staff
to get their flu shots in those countries. 2019 brought NEW vaccines
onto the market, and across the world these vaccines were delivered
to protect the populations against influenza. And then I found this
study in the US National Library of Medicine: "Influenza
vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defence personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season".
Virus
interference: 'The
study of 2880 military personnel found that receiving the influenza
vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a
phenomenon known as virus interference.
...
it appears that the flu shot protects against influenza and it
appears some other types of viruses as well, but it comes at a price
of actually increasing the risk for coronavirus infections. ... the
standard answers of an elderly population and the failure to
implement social distancing soon enough just don't explain what is
happening [in Italy]. My colleague,
Dr. Alex Vasquez, provided me with a valuable insight. In September
2019, Italy rolled out an entirely new type of influenza vaccine - 2
type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses. It looks like
this "super" vaccine impacted the immune system in such a
way to increase coronavirus infection through virus interference that
set stage for what happened in Italy.'
It is clear that animals are
dramatically affected by corona virus after vaccinations. It is
highly likely that the new flu shots might interfere with the bodies'
immune system causing viral interference - resulting in over-immune
responses and cytokine storms, and the very symptoms described by
doctors. An immediate study should be done on COVID-19 patients and
their recent vaccination history to establish any patterns.
Governments across the world -
assisted by media spin - are suggesting we should be saved by a
vaccination, with Bill Gates et al., wanting to rush a COVID-19
(SARS-Cov-2) vaccine for every single man, woman and child on this
planet. 7,7 billion of us. They are even supported by PETA in going
straight to humans:
'...
we [PETA] have been saying for years that experiments on animals are
pointless - they slow down the search for treatment and cures for
human disease... But when it comes to a new coronavirus vaccine, the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) is finally heeding PETA's call.
According to BBC News, the agency isn't waiting for the typical,
lengthy animal-testing phase and is instead heading straight for
human trials." (End of quotation)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen